Best QNAP NAS UK 2026: Top Models Ranked by Value
The best QNAP NAS ranked on capability, with UK prices
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability come from Amazon.co.uk as of the last update and may change.
The best QNAP NAS is the TS-264, around £249.00 at last check (2-bay TS-216G shown at this price point in current stock; TS-264 pricing tracks similarly across UK retailers). It pairs an Intel Celeron N5095 with Quick Sync hardware transcoding, 8GB of RAM expandable to 16GB, dual 2.5GbE and two M.2 slots for caching. That combination handles Plex transcoding, decent multitasking and faster-than-gigabit transfers, something the ARM-based TS-233 simply cannot do. If you only need cheap backup storage, the TS-233 is fine; for anything involving media serving or apps running alongside storage, spend the extra and get Intel.
QNAP NAS picks by budget
Three sensible starting points depending on what you actually need the NAS to do.
Which should you pick
Choose the TS-233 (or similar ARM box) if
- You want a basic backup target for photos, documents and phone backups only
- You will never run Plex, Emby or any app that needs to transcode video on the fly
- Budget is the deciding factor and 2GB of soldered RAM is genuinely enough for your use
- You are comfortable with 1GbE speeds and no M.2 caching
Choose an Intel model (TS-264 or TS-464) if
- You stream media to phones, smart TVs or Chromecast devices that need transcoded video
- You want Quick Sync hardware transcoding so the CPU is not overwhelmed by 4K downscaling
- You want 2.5GbE networking and the option to add M.2 NVMe caching later
- You plan to run several containerised apps (Docker, Plex, surveillance) at once and need the extra RAM headroom
Why the ARM models are a hard stop for transcoding
The TS-233 uses an ARM Cortex-A55 quad-core processor with 2GB of soldered DDR4 RAM and no M.2 slots. It is a perfectly competent box for storing and backing up files over a single 1GbE connection, but it has no hardware transcoding engine QNAP can call on. If you try to play a large 4K file to a device that cannot handle the format natively, the NAS either fails to transcode it or forces a software transcode that will grind the ARM CPU to a halt. This is not a firmware limitation QNAP can fix with an update, it is a silicon limitation.
The same applies to the TS-433 and TS-431K, both ARM-based four-bay units. They are useful if you need more bays and more raw capacity for pure storage or basic Time Machine backups, but treat them exactly like the TS-233 when it comes to media serving: fine for direct-play scenarios where the client device already supports the file format, unsuitable for anything requiring on-the-fly conversion.
Where Intel and Quick Sync change the equation
The TS-264 and TS-464 both use an Intel Celeron N5095 quad-core processor. QNAP's QTS driver stack exposes Intel Quick Sync to Plex, Emby and QNAP's own media apps, so 4K to 1080p downscaling, HDR tone mapping and multiple simultaneous streams are handled by the CPU's integrated graphics rather than brute-forced by software. This is the single biggest practical difference between the ARM and Intel ranges, and it is the reason most people asking 'should I get QNAP for Plex' should be looking at these two models rather than anything ARM-based.
Beyond transcoding, the Intel boxes bring 8GB of RAM (expandable to 16GB), two M.2 slots for NVMe caching, and 2.5GbE networking on both models. The TS-464 adds two extra drive bays over the TS-264, which matters if you are building out a larger array or want a dedicated cache pool alongside four spinning or SSD bays. Neither is dramatically more expensive than the ARM alternatives once you factor in what they let you actually run.
One honest caveat
None of the appliances currently in stock at the prices listed here are the TS-264 or TS-464 themselves, this page lists in-stock QNAP units at time of last check (24 July 2026) and recommends the TS-264/TS-464 spec direction based on QNAP's published range. Check current retailer listings for exact TS-264/TS-464 stock and pricing before buying, and do not assume the TS-216G or TS-433 shown above have Quick Sync, they do not.
QNAP NAS, UK prices
Prices are indicative — last checked 24 July 2026, from Amazon.co.uk. They are not live; check the current price on Amazon before buying. Best £/TB is the lowest at last check.
Frequently asked questions
Can the QNAP TS-233 run Plex at all?
It can install the Plex app and serve files, but it has no hardware transcoding engine. Direct play to compatible devices works fine; anything needing format conversion will struggle or fail outright on the ARM Cortex-A55 CPU.
Is the TS-264 or TS-464 the better buy?
Both share the same Intel Celeron N5095 CPU, 8GB RAM ceiling, and Quick Sync support. Choose the TS-464 if you need four drive bays for capacity or redundancy; choose the TS-264 if two bays cover your storage needs and you would rather save the difference.
Do any QNAP ARM models support hardware transcoding?
No. The TS-233, TS-433 and TS-431K are all ARM-based and QNAP has never exposed a hardware transcode path for these chips. Treat any ARM QNAP as storage and backup only.
Is 2.5GbE actually useful on a home network?
Only if your router, switch and network cabling also support 2.5GbE. Without matching hardware elsewhere, you will still be capped at gigabit speeds regardless of what the NAS offers.
Should I buy the four-bay TS-433 instead of a two-bay Intel model?
Only if raw capacity and drive count matter more to you than transcoding. The TS-433 has more bays but the same ARM limitations as the TS-233, so it is a storage-and-backup choice, not a media server choice.
Does adding M.2 NVMe caching to a TS-264 speed up transcoding?
No, caching improves random read/write performance for things like small-file access or virtual machines. Transcoding performance comes from the Quick Sync engine in the CPU, not from storage speed.